Editor’s Note: We reviewed these shoe selections on August 10, 2023 and updated our recommendations to reflect our most recent round of testing. In addition, we have replaced any pairs that are out of stock or no longer available.
We’re constantly testing the latest running shoes in our lab and on the feet of our 275-runner-strong wear-test team. About half of those runners are men—and most importantly, they’re an extremely diverse group of guys. Some are seriously speedy dudes hitting sky-high mileage and knocking on the door of the Olympic Trials; others are just getting into running or coming back from injury. We have runners of all shapes, sizes, ages, abilities, and backgrounds—from full-time English teachers and new dads to night-shift nurses and grandfathers.
The one thing they’ve all got in common is that they’re passionate about running, and log at least 25 miles per week in their test shoes. Chances are, there’s a shoe here that you’ll love as much as they do, and you can scroll deeper for a variety of shoes that cater to different preferences for stability and cushioning.
The Best Running Shoes for Men
- Best Overall: Hoka Mach 5
- Best for Long Runs: Asics GlideRide 3
- Best Update: Asics Gel-Cumulus 25
- Best for Road Racing: Nike Vaporfly 3
- Best Budget Shoe: Nike Winflo 10
- Best Daily Trainer: New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v13
- Best Road-Trail Hybrid: Hoka Challenger 7
- Best for Speedwork: Saucony Kinvara 14
- Best Cushioned Trail Shoe: Salomon Ultra Glide 2
- Best Stability Shoe: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23
Stability
In terms of running shoe design, stability refers to a shoe’s ability to support good running form. Typically, that means an optimal level of pronation (more on that here). If you’re an overpronator—your feet roll inward excessively—and prefer stability, these shoes have features to help counter that movement. These include firmer foams in key areas of the midsole, like a medial post, or additional material on the edge of the sole to prevent the foot from twisting, like the GuideRails on Brooks’s Adrenaline GTS. If you don’t overpronate, you’ll likely prefer a “neutral” shoe, which doesn’t have extra support features and won’t interfere with your stride.
Cushioning
This is an area where opinions vary widely. Runners who focus on speed may prefer a firmer shoe that gives them a good feel for the ground. Others like something plush that absorbs impact forces. In the past, you usually had to sacrifice some cushioning in order to find a shoe that felt lightweight enough to help shave fractions of a second off your finish time. Thanks to newer foam technology, that’s no longer the case. The Asics Superblast, one of the most cushioned shoes we’ve tested, tips the scale at only 8.6 ounces for a men’s size 9. That’s important for longer runs, because the extra cushioning can reduce aches in tired feet and joints.
How We Test and Select
To select these shoes, we consulted Runner-in-Chief Jeff Dengate for his recommendations on the top running shoes for men, and we also relied on feedback from hundreds of male runners on our wear-test team. After putting countless pairs through the wringer and evaluating the data, we’ve rounded up some of the standouts that have received especially high marks and praise from our male testers. (For an even deeper breakdown of our rigorous testing process, check out how we evaluate shoes.) Seeking tips to get the best fit and price? We’ve got you covered there, too, on how to choose your next favorite pair.
Pros
- New Profly+ midsole is plush and more responsive
- Lighter than than Mach 4
Cons
- Little traction in wet and wintry conditions
Key Specs
| Weight | 8.2 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 5 mm |
| Heel Stack | 29 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 24 mm |
A cushioned road shoe that feels as light and explosive as a race shoe—but still sturdy enough for long training runs—the new Mach 5 replaces its predecessor as perhaps our favorite Hoka ever. To build this versatile trainer, Hoka kept speedy design features from the brand’s race-oriented Carbon X 3 and Rocket X 2 (like propulsive energy return and a sportier, more streamlined upper that hugs your foot) while forgoing the carbon plate. But the big news for v5 is an upgrade to the brand’s usual generous cushioning. The shoe now uses a tweaked formulation of Profly+ midsole foam, which provides plenty of zoom and bounce.
The early-stage Meta-Rocker (a curved sole shape) hasn’t changed; it still rolls you through heel-to-toe transitions quickly. Some of us missed the Mach 4’s oversized heel tab that made it easy to get your feet in and out, but the omission helped the 5 drop nearly a half ounce in weight. Overall, it’s a shoe that excels at everything from interval track workouts to weekend long runs and recovery jogs.
Pros
- Lighter than the GlideRide 2
- Smooth ride with excellent energy return
- Good outsole grip and durability
Cons
- Thick upper mesh runs a bit warm
- Long laces
Key Specs
| Weight | 9.5 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 6 mm |
| Heel Stack | 40 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 34 mm |
“When I think of a luxury, cushioned shoe, I go back to my standard bellwether like an Asics Nimbus or Brooks Glycerin, two of my favorite shoes. But they don’t compare to the GlideRide 3. It’s just an absolute joy to run in,” said one tester, who runs 50Ks and 10-hour backyard-style challenges.
So, what puts the GlideRide in a class of its own? Much of it is Asics’s “GuideSole” design, a combination of two soft foams and a super-aggressive rocker shape. Inside is a TPU plate that curves the toe upward like a ski slope. That geometry is the same on the GlideRide 2, but both of the foams used are softer (the material closest to your foot is now bouncy FlyteFoam Blast+), and the plate is more flexible. The purpose of GuideSole is to reduce ankle motion, which has been shown to help some runners stride more efficiently and expend less energy as a result. According to our testers, it works—but it can take a few runs to adjust to the feeling. For a more traditional ride, we recommend the Gel-Cumulus 25 below.
Pros
- Lighter than the Gel-Cumulus 24
- Smooth ride with excellent shock absorption
- Upper is roomy and soft without feeling sloppy
Cons
- Runs slightly long
- Upper mesh can trap heat and moisture
Key Specs
| Weight | 9.4 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 8 mm |
| Heel Stack | 38 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 30 mm |
Gel-Kayano, Gel-Cumulus, Gel-Nimbus. These titans all have the same first name, and it just got an upgrade. Pure Gel is the lighter, softer version of the brand’s hallmark cushioning. It’s still a bit heavier than midsole foam, so you’ll see it used in workhorse trainers rather than racing models, but not much is needed to reap its benefits. Asics puts a small wedge of the new material in the heel, just enough to smooth landings and absorb shock without weighing you down. Only, you won’t see the squishy gel peeking out like in prior versions of the shoe; Pure Gel blends in with the rest of the midsole, now made of Flytefoam Blast+. Swapping in the light and springy foam lets Asics add 4mm to the midsole, but actually reduces weight from the Gel-Cumulus 24.
Testers said the Cumulus is surprisingly light for its “nice, thick, and foamy” workhorse sole, but it does sacrifice some pep underfoot. “When I wear racers like Asics’s Magic Speed or Saucony’s Endorphin Speed, I feel like I’m being rocked onto my toes, making me more efficient and pushing me forward. While I didn’t feel that sensation in this shoe, it’s one of the most comfortable I’ve worn,” said one tester.
Full Asics Gel-Cumulus 25 Review
Pros
- More stable than the Vaporfly 2
- Extremely high energy return
Cons
- Upper lacks flexibility
Key Specs
| Weight | 7.0 oz (M10) |
|---|---|
| Type | Road Racing |
| Drop | 8 mm |
| Heel Stack | 40 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 32 mm |
Nike overhauled the Vaporfly from the rubber up, looking to make the third version the lightest yet. In our men’s size 12, we see only a 0.1-ounce drop from version 2 (our pink pair of the first Next% was 0.4 ounces lighter still). So, it’s not the lightest ever, but it’s still lighter than competitors like the Asics MetaSpeed Sky+, Saucony Endorphin Pro 3, New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v3, Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3, and Puma Deviate Elite 2.
One attempt to shave weight came in the way Nike shaped the midsole. It’s still using the same Peba-based material for the foam (Nike calls it ZoomX), which delivers top-of-the-line energy return. That foam is already exceptionally lightweight, but Nike added a cutout on the lateral sidewall—your foot doesn’t need support there—and a small channel under the midfoot to reduce material and shave a couple grams.
The shoe is also equipped with a carbon-fiber plate. This high-tech combination of plate and foam allows elite marathoners to race under a five-minute pace, but it’s not just for the pros. Even at slower speeds, the shoe still feels exceptionally propulsive and energetic, making every stride a little more efficient and less taxing. Overall, it just might be the speediest and bounciest shoe we’ve tested yet.
Pros
- Soft and secure ankle collar
- Good outsole durability
- Roomier toebox than v9
Cons
- Cushioning loses some responsiveness over long runs
- Less suited for racing and speedwork
Key Specs
| Weight | 10.1 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 10 mm |
| Heel Stack | 33 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 23 mm |
For running performance and style for under $100, it’s tough to beat the newest Winflo—despite the plusher collar padding and new engineered mesh upper, the price hasn’t budged. For v9, Nike tweaked the formula of the shoe’s Cushlon foam. (It’s still not responsive as the brand’s more premium ZoomX or React, but testers noted a softer ride when compared to the Winflo’s previous versions.) Plus, a larger Air unit now spans the full length of the shoe for a smoother transition from heel to forefoot. Those midsole updates in the v9 carry over unchanged to the v10. Our favorite adjustment to this year’s model? A roomier forefoot and toebox.
“The cushioning is not exceptionally bouncy, but it has a perfect balance of lightness and shock absorption. Side by side with my favorite Hokas, it’s a draw,” said one tester, who reports having a strong heel strike. “Fit and comfort is where this shoe scores its top rating from me. My wide foot found no pressure points, there was plenty of toebox space, and the smooth collar padding held my ankle securely.”
New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v13
New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v13
Pros
- Thick, extremely durable outsole rubber
- More secure lacing with improved midfoot lockdown
- Soft cushioning and smooth ride
Cons
- Heavier than the 880 v12
- Toebox feels slightly narrower than v12
Key Specs
| Weight | 10.6 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 10 mm |
| Heel Stack | 32 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 22 mm |
Last year, New Balance gave the 880’s midsole a substantial, carefully-considered update. Its new dual-density construction overlapped a softer portion of Fresh Foam in the heel with a firmer, denser layer of EVA-based material beneath the midfoot that carried you through toe-off. The result was a ride that comfortably soaked up shock for heel strikers—the vast majority of runners—while keeping turnover smooth and peppy. That much is unchanged for the v13. For this update, New Balance focused on the upper, swapping in engineered mesh with a snugger fit to lockdown the foot noticeably better than its predecessor. (Testers told us this version does feel narrower. But, it’s available in several widths to accommodate a variety of foot shapes.)
“The 880 still takes the prize for being my favorite line of shoes,” one tester said. The generous blown rubber outsole handles high-volume marathon training well—especially if the bulk of your runs are on slick roads and sidewalks. It’s not the lightest shoe, but it’s nimble enough to keep you cruising without clunkiness through double-digit mileage. And if you regularly bounce from your daily run to long hours on your feet, this is a great candidate that can keep up for both. (For those needing less support but a bit more speed and pep, we recommend the new FuelCell Rebel v3.)
Pros
- Lighter than the ATR 6
- New upper mesh is more breathable
- More cushioning than the ATR 6
Cons
- Less suited for deep mud
- Not ideal for speedwork
Key Specs
| Weight | 8.9 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Road and Trail |
| Drop | 5 mm |
| Heel Stack | 31 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 26 mm |
Hoka gave the Challenger ATR 6’s outsole a massive overhaul. The shoe’s seventh version is now more capable on both roads and trails. A combination of angular and squarish lugs grip uneven and chunky terrain, while more exposed triangles of foam and tiny, tight squares near the center roll the shoe smoothly along pavement. Wide spaces between the 4mm lugs also help sluice water and shed mud more quickly. The material itself is also now a tough, slightly sticky rubber. Testers found that the design kept trail gunk from clogging the tread, making the roads home from the trailhead feel light and easy.
“I was skeptical that it would actually do well on multiple surfaces, but it passed the test. In the running for my new favorite pair. These shoes were grippy enough for trails but didn’t feel awkward on roads. I even used them for speed intervals on the treadmill,” one tester said. “The lugs could be more aggressive for really rocky and challenging technical trails, but then I suspect they would be uncomfortable on roads. Overall, I feel like the traction is the perfect compromise.”
Pros
- More breathable upper with locked-in fit
- Flexible toe-off and good ground connection
- Lighter than the Kinvara 13
Cons
- Narrow forefoot and toebox
- Less stable than the Kinvara 13
Key Specs
| Weight | 6.8 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Neutral Road |
| Drop | 4 mm |
| Heel Stack | 31 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 27 mm |
Saucony wanted the Kinvara 14 to be more of a “do-it-all” shoe that could run the gamut as a lightweight daily trainer and even a budget racer. For that reason, the brand added 3mm of cushioning, giving the midsole a similar setup to its hallmark neutral daily trainer (the Ride). But Saucony also lightened this version for the start line by borrowing the same airy, fishnet-like mesh from its top-tier speedy model (the Endorphin Pro 3).
“This shoe is very well-balanced for an everyday comfortable ride that can still respond if you want to drop those last miles of your long run with a little bit of extra spice,” said one tester. “The work is on you to keep this shoe upright and get your foot on the ground in an efficient way. If you need extra support and guidance, look elsewhere.”
Since both shoes use Pwrrun foam and a Pwrrun+ sockliner, it’s not surprising that the Kinvara 14 feels like a stripped-down version of the Ride 16. The experience is nimbler and firmer underfoot—one that’s fun because it’s lean and fast and snappy, not bouncy and squishy-soft.
Full Saucony Kinvara 14 Review
Salomon Ultra Glide 2
Salomon Ultra Glide 2
Pros
- Quick-lacing allows for fast adjustments
- Versatile for easy trails and technical singletrack
- New upper improves breathability
Cons
- Slips a little on flat, wet rocks
- Slightly heavier than v1
Key Specs
| Weight | 10.2 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Trail |
| Drop | 6 mm |
| Heel Stack | 32 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 26 mm |
Traditionally, Salomon’s trail shoes earned a reputation for being fast, firm, aggressive, and narrow—better suited for elites than midpack runners. More recently, however, the company has expanded its lineup to include plusher shoes like the Ultra Glide 2. It’s a soft and accessible trail model with supportive cushioning that most runners will appreciate. (If you’re seeking even more foam underfoot, the Glide Max TR adds an additional six millimeters of foam in the heel, making it Salomon’s tallest and cushiest trail shoe to date.)
Videographer Pat Heine wore the Ultra Glide’s first version on day five of a 327-mile FKT run in April 2021. After more than 250 miles, the hills, rocks, and hours piled up, and he appreciated the Ultra Glide’s support for the final stretch.
“The upper provided enough protection for my tired feet when I inevitably kicked rocks and roots, while the rocker design and extra cushion underfoot took the sting out of pavement and extra-rocky sections, enough for me to make it through the final 75 miles,” he said. The lightweight midsole combines EVA and Olefin for a more forgiving, durable, and springy ride that even impressed the Hoka fanatics of our wear-test squad.
All that cushioning and protection remain in the second version. Salomon rebuilt the shoe’s upper with a more breathable mesh and less padding around the ankle and tongue. And, the insole is now glued inside the shoe. During trail runs well into double-digit mileage, we found these tweaks helped dial in the upper’s fit and lacing; the hold around the midfoot and arch feels snug and secure without creating any hotspots or rubbing.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23
Pros
- Good arch support
- Lighter than the Adrenaline GTS 22
Cons
- Less suited for speed workouts
Key Specs
| Weight | 10.1 oz (M9) |
|---|---|
| Type | Stability Road |
| Drop | 12 mm |
| Heel Stack | 36 mm |
| Forefoot Stack | 24 mm |
The Adrenaline GTS is Brooks’s well-loved stability shoe that has a lighter, less obtrusive GuideRails system, rather than a medial post, to provide support. The 23rd iteration has that same design, which places material along the edges of the sole to keep your feet in alignment. (This makes it accessible for both overpronators and neutral runners, since the extra support engages only if you need it). Overall, the shoe feels slightly softer and smoother than previous models, thanks to the new DNA Loft v2 foam that spans the full length of the midsole. The Adrenaline still provides excellent shock absorption, and the rubber outsole delivers great traction and durability for high-mileage runners.
Michael is a freelance writer with years of experience covering gear and the outdoors for Runner's World and other publications; when he's not writing, he's usually biking, hiking, and running in the mountains around Los Angeles, where he lives.
Jeff is Runner-in-Chief for Runner's World, guiding the brand's shoes and gear coverage. A true shoe dog, he's spent more than a decade testing and reviewing shoes. In 2017, he ran in 285 different pairs of shoes, including a streak of 257 days wearing a different model.
